I spoke to Ravi at Collabera and we confirmed
my phone call with Marcus at 930. When
called the number I ended up on a conference call with Marcus, Steve, Gordon
and Vikram. Steve apparently was an
associate that I remember speaking with before.
I wrote that the team I had applied for
a job with did support for the development of GIS software. Marcus asked some questions for the team
saying that the project I was applying for was phase two of the project and
that they had a query tool that created tables, used GRASS and identified
buffered areas. He called it an ETl tool
that does data visualization, where if the data doesn’t pass inspection it may
not be used.
I described some of my previous
experience and then Steve explained that Phase Two would be provide further integration
with existing software. He called it
regression testing to see if data was displayed correctly and then described how
the day to day activity was meant to query the db and verify that it make the
correct outputs and if not then we would have to make the new data. The team then explained that they were
looking at what changes affect the front end tool correctly, saying that Gordon
defines the requirements in liaison with the group and that everyone has to meet
with him occasionally. They said there
were also general requests from other teams as well.
I told Marcus I wasn’t certain what a
Feature Manipulation Engine (FME) was.
However, once they explained that it was a buffer tool which turned
routes into events I told them that I had experience with tools like this. They said it was an ETL tool and that was
crucial to interface with the FME developer to understand what manual changes
were necessary.
Marcus indicated that I needed to know about
shp and geodatabase exports but Steven explained that a lot of that was
peripheral. Marcus also asked me what I
had done in the GIS area. Here I
explained that my GIS background covered many years and that I was quite
capable with the environment that they had described. I also indicated that the specific types of
buffering and manipulation were like second nature to me especially when it
comes to tracking changes and testing.
I’m competent at data export/import and
that once the tool is made then a lot of the work was already done. I also noted that scripts need to be watched
every time the process changes—especially if you make a new data source. Steve then said we wouldn’t be building
anything but that interfacing with the team was important. He also said that I would be checking the
source of the data and making certain that the front end tool was correct.
Vikram then went on to say that the
process was just as complicated as my last position with the company. He then asked me to explain how my previous
experience coincided with what they explained.
I explained the process of moving data from sharepoint to access to the
engineers and finally to the uploaders group.
I made certain to name all the principle actors as a reference as well.
I told them that the data Ihad been
using didn’t use shapefiles and explained the lag between each teams procedures. I said that we used Access to query and then
send data to the engineers and that I also knew how to upload data. I described the process of loading and then
sending the data to the testers and went on to explain our “Linear Match” tool
for addressing buffering issues.
Steve went on to say that they use Model
Builder and I said that I had experience with it. He then said that they used a testing model
for testing which only needed my feedback.
I explained that a model is easy to understand if you have access to the
source data to see what is going on with it.
I said that from the description I
understood the job well. I then
confirmed the location and asked how many people were on the team and sounded
like there were around 10 with 4 developers and a couple of testers.
Within an hour Ravi called to tell me I
had landed the job and that the HR guy would call me. He called a half hour later to confirm that I
had received the job. He then asked if I
would accept it. He said that the
contract was 6 months with the possibility of more. He then confirmed my compensation and said he
would send me the details.
No comments:
Post a Comment